Replay | The Next-Gen Procurement Podcast | The Procurement Dashboards of the Future

Many procurement dashboards are built to display data, but not to drive action.

In this episode, Focal Point CEO Anders Lillevik and Roy Anderson of Northeastern University explore what next-generation supplier dashboards should actually enable: action, efficiency, and measurable impact.

They break down how leading teams are moving beyond static KPIs to track the activities that truly move the needle, from supplier performance insights to project-level execution. Through real examples, they show how Focal Point customers are turning passive reporting into orchestration-ready workflows.

If your dashboards still feel like static snapshots, this session offers a clear path toward a more dynamic, action-oriented approach.

Watch the replay to see how procurement teams are transforming dashboards into drivers of real business value.

00:02: Introduction & Topic: Procurement Dashboards
00:51: Evolution of Dashboards (AI & Orchestration Impact)
01:12: Challenges with Traditional Dashboards
02:16: From Reactive to Proactive Data & Insights
03:02: Real-Time Risk Monitoring & Supplier Impact
04:02: Team Management & Resource Visibility
05:44: Internal Customer Value & Procurement Impact
06:35: Future Dashboards: Actionable Insights & Outcomes
07:29: Managing Risk, Contracts & Real-Time Events
09:12: Role-Based Dashboards & Stakeholder Views
11:18: From Data to Action: Triggers & Workflows
13:12: Innovation Opportunities from Supplier Data
14:03: Process Visibility, Bottlenecks & Efficiency
16:16: Example: Financial Risk Dashboard (Third-Party Data)
18:00: Example: Third-Party Risk Dashboard (Deep Dive)
22:47: Value of Dashboards: Driving Action & Continuous Improvement
24:21: Closing & Next Episode

So, for those of us who are joining us

on the podcast, if you can drop us a

note in the chat to see where you guys

are calling in from or joining us from,

that’d be great. And also, if you have

any questions at all during this

podcast, please feel free to drop them

in the chat as well. So, today we are

here to talk about procurement

dashboards.

And as a when I started in procurement,

dashboards were fledgling at best,

right? And basically if you had some

idea of how much money you spent with a

supplier or in total, you pretty much

you were there. And we weren’t talking

about contract repository and cycle

times and savings tracking and all the

other good stuff that we do today. With

the advent of orchestration and with the

advent of AI, a dashboards have taken a

life of their own. So today we’re going

to talk about the shortcomings of the

current dashboards, what the future

dashboards should look like, and really

what you’re trying to get out of those

dashboards as you start to look forward.

So with that, Roy, how about we jump

right into

that? Sound sounds good. Let’s make it

happen.

So maybe you should talk about some of

these things, right? Because this is

fairly fairly straightforward stuff. So

where do you see dashboards falling

short today?

Today, everyone has a dashboard.

Literally, everyone has created a

dashboard. If you can create a graphic

screen, you go, “Oh, here’s your

dashboard.” And you’re colorful. But

I’ve always asked the the suppliers, I

said, “Okay, tell me how I’m using this

data. How am I going to be able to be

take actions based upon this activity?

Is this just a reactive activity? Can I

get into the proactive side of of this

data?” And unfortunately the significant

number of the individuals are saying hey

listen this is just presenting what was

and it’s pretty stale data in most cases

and it’s you could spend a lot of time

on it and over time I my team did but

still it just failed in terms of being

actionable data that I could present to

leadership to be able to say hey this is

where we’re headed this is why we need

resources this is the result of our

activity it wasn’t valuable.

Yeah, I think you’re right. And some of

the things that we always struggle with

is the whole idea of dashboards just

being a picture and it’s not malleable,

right? Like you can’t go deep into a

specific area. So for example, like it’s

great that you know that you have a

hundred suppliers that are considered

high inherent risk, but it sure will be

know sure be nice to know how many of

those are in for example marketing and

have a presence in I don’t know

Southeast Asia and all of a sudden you

can get to something that is actionable

or even better yet if if there’s an

event that you can actually get to the

point of realizing what the impacts are.

So for example, if there is a hurricane

in Southeast Asia, which of your

companies are actually going to

potentially be impacted and that

right those are really the cool things

that so we talk about strategic

questions and being able to interact

with the data by applying filters or

lenses as we call them, right? And with

that drive action,

right? And then there’s real time feeds

that you want to be able to utilize

effectively that trigger activity that

you need to take now. So there like

example when I was the chief procurement

officer at Metife we had 18,000 unique

suppliers obviously that’s a million

second tier suppliers that we were

trying to figure out what how they

impacted our requirements now it is a

financial services company so we’re not

talking manufacturing per se but still

we could be shut down or negatively

impacted and I wanted to be able to get

feeds from risk players and from even as

you mentioned hurricanes weather sites

which of my suppliers are being

negatively impacted that I’ve got to

reach out to them and that’s got to be

real time. That’s got and then be

proactive if we can so that we can be

ahead of it versus always finding out on

Monday morning that something happened

and now we’re in trouble.

Yeah. And the other cool thing too as

we’re learning and getting into more and

more proactive dashboards like people

want to know how many projects are late,

how many projects are sitting with legal

right now, how many things are sitting

on this particular person’s desk waiting

for some for action, those kinds of

things.

Yeah.

But the coolest thing that we worked on

was really about the team management

within procurement because let’s say you

have 15 people in procurement doing

sourcing deals. They’re probably working

on a couple hundred projects at the same

time. And the thing that we always found

interesting is look double clicking on

for example a team within procurement

and seeing how many projects are they

working on. Which two or three resources

are the really good workers that get

gifted work all the time because it’s

always the best people in my experience

who are the busiest because people want

to work with them,

right? And just being able to double

click on a particular person and seeing

all right this person’s working on eight

projects and this person is the

responsible for these 10 supply

relationship in this category. All of a

sudden you get a really good

three-dimensional view of your your

resources, what they’re working on, how

busy they are, and also who are who is

not. Right? And the other thing that we

try to do with the team management

dashboards is some people do this, some

people don’t do this, but have net

promoter scores for their customers,

right? At the end of every project, you

can say, “Did you enjoy working with Roy

Anderson on this project?” Zero to nine

or one to 10. and basically said he’s

doing pretty good on the savings part

when people hate working with him and

again like that could be another thing

look into my file obviously

yeah the one of the things that I really

really liked about this new solution set

is the fact that you start to understand

your internal customers they’ve always

asked what are you doing for me how are

I’m getting a charge because of this

overhead structure you’re a part of this

charge are you doing anything for me are

you supporting my activity now you can

go back to the senior level person

saying, “Here’s all the contracts that

we’re supporting your activity. Here’s

the impact that we’ve had on those

contracts and here’s the internal

customer and the sourcing manager that’s

supporting your activity.” So, you start

building this reputation as being

someone that delivers results and can

then document that clearly and go

through an auditable process so that

everyone feels like these aren’t made up

numbers. This is where it was. This is

where we are today. Here’s the

improvements.

Amazing. Let’s go to the next slide. And

when we’re talking about the dashboards

of the future, right? It’s not enough

anymore to just have a uni-dimensional

data set that just shows you what

happened last month, right? And I think

as we get into it, like we need to have

data that fuel insights that lead to

action and then outcomes and everything

is tracked soup to nuts. And I think

that’s really where we need to get to

where things are basically actionable as

and when needed. And you could have a a

supplier event. For example, you have a

supplier failure or a subcontractor

failure that could then impact your

suppliers. And then say, “Hey, something

happened here. Here are the 10 suppliers

that could be directly impacted by this

failure of a fourth party. Now, here are

the actions you should be taking.” That

is real and that’s actionable. What are

you seeing out there Roy in terms of

things you can add to this discussion?

So from the amount of dynamic nature

we’ve seen, of course, tariffs is in the

news every minute. The relationships

with our countries, relationships with

our suppliers inside of those countries.

This is a very dynamic situation. And

the idea is a sourcing effort or a

contract that’s in place is being

impacted by these realtime events.

Frequently you get these contracts that

sit there for three years and no one’s

really acting on them even though

there’s a risk being built inside those

contracts that don’t get looked at for

three years. If you have a holistic view

and your portfolio is not only of your

sourcing activity today, which is in

real time adjustments and decisions that

need to be made, but also the contracts

that are in play and how they’re being

impacted, you want to be able to know

when and how you have to take actions in

order to mitigate risks that are

developing. And having that insight is

crucial for you to be able to be

responsive and not have to be called in

to the CFO or CEO’s office and say, “Why

didn’t you know about this? Why didn’t

you take actions on this opportunity?”

Where what I love to do is be able to

say, “Hey, we have information. This is

how it’s going to impact you internal

customer and these are the actions that

we suggest to take in order to be able

to mitigate the risk before it actually

happens.” So you are proactive, you’re

responsive to your internal customer,

you can actually create that value

proposition that becomes very real and

visible to your internal customers and

management of the company.

Yeah. And one thing we double click a

little bit on is the whole idea of role

based, right? So the thing that I always

love about starting with a new customer

is seeing what they want to see as part

of their dashboard, right? Because if

you don’t really know who your suppliers

are, what risks there are, what you’re

spending, what the opportunities are,

knowing about fourth party suppliers and

negative news assessments of fourth

parties, it’s less relevant for you,

right? So you have to crawl, walk, run.

So the whole idea of having a role-based

view and showing people what is

important to them rather than saying

this is best in class, that could be

very overwhelming for someone who’s just

starting out. And it’s fun to do and see

how things progress as people mature

into the procurement function.

Yeah, I love the role-based concept

because I’ll tell you right now, you

have a meeting with your finance team,

whether it’s the budget people up to the

CFO, they have a different perspective

on the risks and issues that they want

to take take into consideration. You go

into the advertising and marketing

group, they have a whole different

perspective of what they want to see and

the actions they want to take. You get

into your audit team, totally different

response. the internal customer or the

production line or the engineering

teams, the marketing teams, they all

have different perspectives and a

different view of the exact same

contractual situation. So you have to

understand their role. And the fun part

is as you start to add in more AI

visibility into this and the data starts

to become more digital, AI can take

better action on it. And then as you get

to tier two and tier three, which just

explodes your footprint, you need to

have those AI levels and those

role-based views in order to be able to

be actionable and to get through all the

junk to get to those pieces where you

can take appropriate action effectively.

It also really highlights the need that

the supply chain talent needs to grow

and develop significantly away from

their transactional nature and into more

strategic, proactive, forward-looking

solutions.

100%. So let’s move on to the next slide

here, Maya. So what should a dashboard

do today? And we’re focusing a lot here

on negative stuff. So if a KPI is read

or risk identifier or supply cyber

event, yeah, we need to definitely

action those things too. But this also

could be true for let’s say a savings

opportunity shows up or a new project

comes in or whatever the case may be,

right? So all of these triggers could

still be a positive thing, not

necessarily a negative thing. And we

talk about the whole idea here of

something happened and now you have to

do something about it. And today

for example we can come up with

corrective actions to say all right

there is a hurricane in Southeast Asia.

Here are your direct here are your

direct suppliers that could be impacted

and here are you second tier suppliers

that could be impacted and hence your

first could trigger an outage. So then

what are the corrective actions? You

should probably pick up the phone and

call somebody or send an email right and

assign ownership to who needs to follow

up and then escalate and those kinds of

things right? The whole idea now of

having a dashboard that sort of just

stares at you is not good enough. You

actually need to do something when

things are happening, right?

Yeah.

Yeah. It’s interesting. We tend to spend

our time on how do we find negative

activity. But actually the golden nugget

from that conversation was we need to

spend a lot more time on where new

information comes in that creates

opportunities for innovation where we

have a supplier that has oh unveiled a

new capability a new solution set and it

is in those not only your first tier but

your second tier suppliers that are

saying I’ve got something new and if you

don’t see it obviously you can’t

favorably impact your internal customers

but as do start to get those feeds of

information not about just negative but

all the new positive innovation things

which realistically I think is the 70

80% the 10 20% is the negatives the

80%’s the possibility of being more

innovative with your supply chain and as

I I tell my class all the time I said

for every revenue dollar anywhere from

40 to 70% of that revenue dollar is

going to your suppliers that means You

need your suppliers to be more

innovative and be the source of an

innovation engine that’s going to be

able to feed your engineering groups,

your production groups, your design

groups, R&D groups because that’s where

your innovation is going to come from.

So where we need to spend more time on

the positives, the opportunities, the

innovation of this of this dashboard

solution.

Yep. 100%. And the last bullet point

last two actually is dynamic feedback

loops and surfacing bottlenecks. So one

of the things that we do a lot of focal

point is process obviously right but in

every organization there’s always the

folks that are not all that expeditious

in executing tasks right so the whole

idea of why does a sourcing process take

x amount of time being able to lay that

out in a dashboard way and say legal 80%

of the time takes this long and

henceforth they’re on the critical path

and being able to identify where things

are and I think having the ability to

have a visual to say we had 200 100

projects last year and on average this

is how long it takes by gates by

stakeholder. It’s a very powerful thing

and it’s not anecdotal anymore because

you actually have the underlying data to

support it and you can actually make it

look pretty whisbang, right? So, it’s

pretty cool. And then

yeah, I think your the idea of

bottlenecks your internal customer

thinks that they say, “Okay, I’m being

told I I need to use this sourcing

function or or they got an audit hit

because they don’t utilize that sourcing

capability the way they should.” And

then it goes into this black hole and

they go, “How long? Why does it take

three months to get something done? I

could have gotten it done by next Monday

by just calling my friend and the

supplier and coming to an agreement.” So

they see this whole and they think it’s

all the sourcing team doing the work.

But in actuality, once you go through

the process, you have risk reviews and

audit reviews and legal reviews that all

take time to make it a much better

solution. But we all have to realize

that process has to be both visible to

the internal customer so they see it.

Also visible in terms of the value

that’s created and be very reasonable

and saying this is taking too long but

now we can target the areas that take

the time how what actions can we take to

speed that up or to eliminate it

entirely. Concepts I’ve always used is

simplify eliminate automate simplify the

process and not do the steps because

you’ve now digitized it. So you don’t

need to do the manual steps. Eliminate

all those things that don’t add value

and then automate the entire structure

so that it can be fast.

Hallelujah. If we eliminated all the

nonsense, it would be free up a lot of

time.

So we’re going to jump into a couple of

examples of reporting now. And

ironically, this is not one of ours.

This is a rapid ratings financial his

financial stability assessment of a

specific supplier. And I like this

because it’s basically it tells you

everything that you need to know on one

slide. Shout out to Rapid Ratings for

this one, right? But here you can see

that a supplier is being evaluated and

the financial health rating is green and

it’s right in line with the sector

average. So that that’s really good. And

the same thing here with the core health

score. Again, the really good line with

expectations of the sector. And I like

the visual on the right because it tells

you whether a supplier is an A, B, C or

D. And basically the whole idea here is

if it’s not, let’s say that you have a

fairly advanced risk program and you can

say if a supplier shows up in C or D,

then you need to trigger a workflow to

do a secondary review. Maybe you collect

balance sheet and income statements from

the supplier for your own propeller

heads to look at it. Right? So to me,

this is a great example of once you

actually get to learn what you’re

looking at here, it’s very easy to say,

“Yep, this provides value.” And I don’t

really have a lot of improvement

opportunities for these guys. It’s it’s

a great partnership for us. We love

dealing with them, but it’s a great it’s

a great piece of piece of work right

here. Well, what I like about Focal

Point is that it’s an open system and

the fact that it can take data from

third parties and present it versus

being just in internal only activity.

This adds value.

So then we’re going to go into a a

customer report that we built for a

customer. So this is the third party

risk management dashboard. Right? And

you can see here you have six widgets.

You have the first widget on the top

leftand corner shows you the

distribution of the 20 suppliers between

the risk categories. Right? So red is

bad. Right? And orange not so good.

Green and yellow are okay. Right? So

this is inherent risk in terms of high,

medium, low and high. And then you can

see the infosc posture of the suppliers

on the bottom left, the privacy risk

posture on the next one. And then you

have legal risk and then you have

financial risk. So basically it’s a risk

dashboard where you can look at things

and you look at the distribution of

where you potentially could have risk,

right? So just because somebody’s

inherent inherent risk score is high

doesn’t mean that they’re a risky

supplier. It just means that they are

performing risky stuff, right? that that

you probably need to monitor, right? So

again, this is what the customer wanted

to see and we are performing inherent

risk and followup on infosc on privacy

on on legal risk and all those kinds of

things so that the risk propeller head

can have a look and see what actions

need to be taken.

Nothing super sexy here. It’s a lot of

underlying data that goes underneath.

But if you click one down, you you click

on that red top leftand corner thing and

you get to see okay, who are my top two

suppliers that are critical, right? And

here you can see again this is fake

data, right? Reser took it. But if you

double click on that now, you get to see

who the two suppliers are. You get to

see the total annual spend. You get to

see how many contracts you have with

them. And then you get to see who the

supplier owner is. And you get to see

the status of the supplier, right? And

of course, if you click further into

this, you can see everything that’s

moving with these two suppliers. You can

see how many projects they’re engaged

in. You can see how many contracts that

are coming up for renewal. You can see

when the next QBR is, like all those

kinds of things. So, it becomes really

deep and you can go into the minute

details of this specific supplier. And

again, it starts with the dashboard and

then you go deep deep. And if you then

clicked on the the next one and you can

then see if you clicked on the infosc

posture ones then you get to see all

right those suppliers that had a red

infosc posture how are they looking

overall. So you get to see here to the

extent to which you have sock twos or

you have an ISO 27001

how many of them are current how many of

them are expired how many of them are

coming up for renewal and again the ones

that are yellow and red there’s an

action that needs to be taken relatively

quickly. So with focal point obviously

if you’re yellow we would then say

automatically ask the supplier to update

their information but if it turns red

you probably need to do more manual

follow-ups. Again, you make it very

actionable and you follow up where you

have to follow up. Again, this is just I

don’t want us to do a clickthrough of

the system. I just about show you the

art of the possible. Any comments,

questions, concern with that?

No, I love what I like in this scenario

is the fact that I can see myself

sitting down with my internal customer

and being able to show their role,

showing, hey, you own this type of

activity. You’re one of three customers

for this supplier. the suppliers getting

into difficulties, we suggest that we

put this out to bid, finding a second

supplier or move the work entirely over

to another supplier base or supplier

footprint in order to minimize this risk

that you have. So now you can drill into

any of the suppliers of that internal

customer. How big of a player are they?

Are they the small fish in the bigger

pond or are they the Goliath that’s

actually driving most of the spend? And

then how do we take actions in order to

get better results, better innovation,

lower risk, better cost structures for

them, the internal customer. Having that

at our fingertips makes the procurement,

the supply chain data come alive for the

internal customer. as we nerd out on

some of these things, right? Like one of

the things that I love doing with with

customers that are signing up for for

our supplier management platform is the

whole idea of risk with second tier

suppliers because basically you you’ll

be amazed how many of your suppliers use

AWS or Azure or Google and you don’t and

even like you don’t have direct

relationships with those suppliers,

right? So having the idea of

concentration risk with secondary

suppliers just is really interesting and

it’s something that we really enjoy

doing because to me as a as an old guy

doing procurement now it’s amazing

information that you can get even with

organizations that you don’t have

relationships with

and without a dashboard it’s hard to

get. So last this last slide of the day

here is going to be our sales stick

right. So how do we fit into this? What

I would like to say here is the value of

the dashboard is not really what it

shows but what the hell you can do with

it. And as you look at a supplier or a

stakeholder or the or a category, right?

The whole idea of being able to see

everything that’s moving within that

category supplier or stakeholder and how

are you going to interact with that with

this with that system? how you’re going

to interact with that data so you can

figure out how to save money, mitigate

risk, get real work done and track

progress against it. And the whole idea

here is stop looking in the rearview

mirror and move towards continuous

improvement so you can actually add

value to the business. And that’s why we

started the company and we love doing

this stuff, right? As you can tell, we

are procurement people throughout nerdy

about it. Anything to add to that? What

you know what I find really interesting

is you understand the people putting it

together. Where are they coming from?

Are they the science people? Are they

the data people? Are they the process

flow people? Or are they actually the

former users that had real problems to

solve? And how do they go about solving

it? And the results are very different.

And you can understand when someone

something’s being developed by a person

that ran into these problems and needed

a solution for it. All of a sudden, you

find the tools that they develop create

solutions that work. So, I just get a

kick out of it. I love having former

procurement types driving these types of

solutions.

All right, we wouldn’t we wouldn’t let

you guys go until we slug the next

episode, which is on February 18th. So,

there’s two QR codes here. One is to

register for the next episode

and we also have some homework for

people who care to take do this, right?

So the second QR code is is a link to a

procurement dashboard and the

effectiveness scorecard. So basically

you get to download this information for

yourself and see how well you guys are

doing in your organization on

best-in-class procurement dashboards and

driving actions there from. So guys, as

always, my name is Andrew. You can find

me on LinkedIn and all the socials.

And Jeremy, I’m pretty sure we can make

this available to you. We’ll get Maya to

do that. And yeah, guys, please reach

out to me directly either on LinkedIn or

email. And Roy, thanks again for

spending another perfectly good half

hour with me.

You probably could have used it much

more productive elsewhere, but thanks

everybody.

Speakers

Professional headshot of Anders Lillevik - Chief Executive Officer

Anders Lillevik

Serial Chief Procurement Officer with 20+ years of experience in building and turning around large, complex procurement organizations to be best in class. Anders has extensive background in rolling out new procurement infrastructure and optimizing legacy technology investments. With this experience, Anders founded Focal Point to help organizations maximize the value of their procurement spend.
Roy Anderson Headshot

Roy Anderson

Roy Anderson is a procurement and supply chain leader with over 30 years of experience across global organizations. He has served as Chief Procurement Officer at companies like Tradeshift, State Street, and MetLife, and is now a lecturer from Northeastern University, helping develop future procurement professionals.

Watch next

Let’s talk about your procurement potential.